Real-World Evidence for Public Health Emergencies
The ICMRA Working Group on Real-World Evidence for Public Health Emergencies was established to provide a collaborative forum for international regulatory agencies to proactively enhance the efficiency and coordination of critical responses to emerging public health emergencies through joint studies and evidence generation.
The Working Group achieves this by establishing agile governance principles and streamlined processes designed to accelerate the generation of timely evidence to support prompt regulatory action.
The Working Group works to optimise preparedness by leveraging existing infrastructures across participating jurisdictions. This approach enables members to test, refine, and maintain ‘ever-warm’ governance and operational processes, ensuring readiness to rapidly launch collaborative studies when new public health threats arise.
Members:
- National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), Brazil
- Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (CBG-MEB), The Netherlands
- Danish Medicines Agency (DKMA), Denmark
- European Medicines Agency (EMA), European Union
- Food and Drug Administration (TFDA), Chinese Taipei
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA), United States of America
- Health Canada (HC), Canada
- Health Sciences Authority (HSA), Singapore
- Medsafe, New Zealand
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (MHLW/PMDA), Japan
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), United Kingdom
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut – German Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines (PEI), Germany
- South African Health products Regulatory Agency (SAHPRA), South Africa
- Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Saudi Arabia
- Swissmedic, Switzerland
- National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), China
- World Health Organisation (WHO)
Useful resources
ICMRA statement on international collaboration to enable RWE for regulatory decision-making (2023)
Collaborative studies
Background incidence rates (BGRs) of adverse events of special interest (AESIs)
- Objective(s): Generate BGRs of AESIs for public health emergencies preparedness and to support early stages of vaccine safety signal evaluation.
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) drug utilisation study
- Objective(s): Provide an overview of GLP-1 RA utilisation patterns, patients characteristics and how these have changed over the past ten years in comparison with other medicinal products used in diabetes and for weight management. The aim is to describe prescribing trends and identify determinants driving the demand for GLP-1 RAs and recent supply shortages.
More details on both collaborative studies will be published in the coming months.
Former ICMRA COVID-19 Real-World Evidence and Observational Studies Working Group
The ICMRA COVID-19 Real-World Evidence and Observational Studies Working Group was established in May 2020 to strengthen global regulatory collaboration on real-world evidence (RWE) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The group concluded its mandate in February 2024, transitioning its lessons learned and activities to the new ICMRA Working Group on Real-World Evidence for Public Health Emergencies.
Between 2020 and 2023, the Working Group focused on leveraging observational studies to inform regulatory decisions and to promote coordination on disease characterization, treatment safety and effectiveness, and vaccine surveillance. It issued key ICMRA statements highlighting the importance of international collaboration and transparent communication of COVID-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness.
Three main technical workstreams advanced global evidence generation:
- The COVID-19 Vaccine Pharmacovigilance Network (VPN) shared emerging vaccine safety information and contributed to the ICMRA/WHO Vaccines Confidence Joint Statement.
- The CONSIGN pregnancy research program pooled data from international partners to study medicine use and outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19.
- The Building International Cohorts initiative produced joint studies on steroid use, coagulopathy, and COVID-19 case definitions, strengthening shared data models and analytical alignment.
Useful resources:
- ICMRA statement: Statement for healthcare professionals: How COVID-19 vaccines are regulated for safety and effectiveness (Revised 11 June 2021) | International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA)
- ICMRA statement: Global regulators commit to cooperate on observational research in the context of COVID-19 (May 2020)
- Lessons learnt: Collaborative Real‐World Evidence Among Regulators: Lessons and Perspectives - Beck - 2025 - Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics - Wiley Online Library
- Minutes:
- Global regulators discuss observational studies of real world data for COVID-19 medicines (April 2020)
- Global regulators commit to cooperate on observational research in the context of COVID-19 (May 2020)
- Global regulatory workshop on COVID-19 real-world evidence and observational studies (July 2020)
- Strengthening global collaboration on COVID-19 real-world evidence and observational studies (October 2020)
- International regulatory workshop on observational studies and real-world data (January 2021)
- International regulatory workshop on observational studies and real-world data (May 2021)
- International regulatory workshop on observational studies and real-world data (May 2022)
- ICMRA meeting: COVID-19 Real World Evidence and Observational studies (September 2023)
- ICMRA meeting: COVID-19 Real World Evidence and Observational studies (February 2024)
- Links to other relevant publications
- Layton, D. Systemic glucocorticoids in the treatment of COVID-19 and risks of adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients in the primary and secondary care setting. https://catalogues.ema.europa.eu/node/3002/administrative-details (2020).
- Bradley, M. C. et al. Systemic Corticosteroid Use for COVID-19 in US Outpatient Settings From April 2020 to August 2021. JAMA 327, 2015–2018 (2022).
- Re, V. L. & Cocoros, N. Assessment of the Natural History of Coagulopathy in COVID-19 | Sentinel Initiative. https://www.sentinelinitiative.org/methods-data-tools/methods/assessment-natural-history-coagulopathy-covid-19 (2020).
- Lo Re, V. et al. Association of COVID-19 vs Influenza With Risk of Arterial and Venous Thrombotic Events Among Hospitalized Patients. JAMA 328, 637–651 (2022).
- Lo Re, V. et al. Risk of admission to hospital with arterial or venous thromboembolism among patients diagnosed in the ambulatory setting with covid-19 compared with influenza: retrospective cohort study. BMJ Med. 2, e000421 (2023).
- Prieto-Alhambra, D. Natural history of coagulopathy and use of anti-thrombotic agents in COVID-19 patients and persons vaccinated against SARS-COV-2. https://catalogues.ema.europa.eu/node/2935/administrative-details (2021).
- Prieto-Alhambra, D. & Burn, E. Natural history of coagulopathy and use of anti-thrombotic agents in COVID-19 patients and persons vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. at https://catalogues.ema.europa.eu/node/3840/administrative-details (2021).
- Burn, E. et al. Venous or arterial thrombosis and deaths among COVID-19 cases: a European network cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22, 1142–1152 (2022).
- Li, X. et al. Comparative risk of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome or thromboembolic events associated with different covid-19 vaccines: international network cohort study from five European countries and the US. BMJ 379, e071594 (2022).
- Lo Re Iii, V. et al. Risk of Arterial and Venous Thrombotic Events Among Patients with COVID-19: A Multi-National Collaboration of Regulatory Agencies from Canada, Europe, and United States. Clin. Epidemiol. 16, 71–89 (2024).
- Kluberg, S. A. et al. Validation of diagnosis codes to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients in health care claims data. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 31, 476–480 (2022).
- Covid-19 infectiON and medicineS In preGNancy (CONSIGN). https://zenodo.org/communities/consign?q=&l=list&p=1&s=10&sort=newest.